• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar
  • NEWS:
  • SatNews
  • SatMagazine
  • MilSatMagazine
  • SmallSat News
  • |     EVENTS:
  • SmallSat Symposium
  • Satellite Innovation
  • MilSat Symposium

SatNews

  • HOME
  • Magazines
  • Events
  • SmallSat Symposium Updates
  • Industry Calendar
    • IN PERSON
    • VIRTUAL
  • Subscribe

SES Americom + Inmarsat Want Payments

July 16, 2020

Image is courtesy of Dmitry Demidko

On July 15th, it was reported that SES Americom was arguing with Intelsat’s bankruptcy court that Intelsat should pay $1.8 billion to SES because of a “contract violation” over the pair’s C-band Alliance (CBA) agreement and the clearance of spectrum for 5G.

Following the news, satellite analyst Sami Kassab from investment bank Exane/BNPP issued a guidance note to clients, saying the bank understands that there was a legally-binding agreement in place between C-band members on how proceeds would be broken down between members and how the CBA would operate. SES claims Intelsat breached that agreement.

“Throughout the C band process, consensus (based on Intelsat rough guidance) assumed that Intelsat and SES would get the same share of C band proceeds (probably reflecting the perceived nature of the CBA agreement). However, the FCC ultimately awarded $897 million more to Intelsat than to SES in its final order. SES is claiming compensatory damage of $450 million (which is half the $897 million excess proceeds Intelsat is due to receive). In addition, SES is claiming punitive damage worth a typical 3x the compensatory damage claim (ie $1350 million),” stated the bank. “We note however that the total C band breakdown has been decided by the FCC and not by a satellite operator. The breakdown has been accepted by all operators. We believe this is likely to be the defense strategy Intelsat will adopt.”

The bank then added, “We do not expect any delays to the timing of C band clearing and payments from this legal development. SES reports on August 7th.

Adding to the legal miasma within the satellite industry, last week Australia-based Speedcast (in bankruptcy reconstruction) struck an agreement with Intelsat (in Chapter 11 bankruptcy) which will see Speedcast continue its relationship with Intelsat over the next 15 months and pay what it owes to Intelsat.

Speedcast owed Intelsat $45 million of old pre-bankruptcy invoices and will pay $24 million to cover obligations through June of this year.

Now London-based Inmarsat wants a similar deal and with outstanding invoices to Speedcast of almost $26 million. Inmarsat is the second-largest creditor for Speedcast.

Inmarsat filed a motion with Speedcast’s bankruptcy court and asked the court to order Speedcast to cough up $1.35 million in undisputed and outstanding invoices. The invoices have all been raised after Speedcast’s bankruptcy on April 23rd and cover 44 separate invoices.

Inmarsat says the company is concerned about its own financial position and told the court that, despite receiving some $90 million in ‘debtor in possession’ financial help, the Speedcast bills are piling up rapidly. Inmarsat stated that $2.74 million is owed and already past due for the second-half of July and at least $3.1 million for August.

The Inmarsat bills for Speedcast are varied in size ranging from a modest $75 from Inmarsat Canada to $703,698 due to Inmarsat Cyprus.

Reports by journalist Chris Forrester, filing at the Advanced Television infosite...

Image is courtesy of Speedcast.

Filed Under: Business Moves, Legal

Primary Sidebar

Most Read Stories

  • In Their Honor ... Lest We Forget
  • In celebration of Juneteenth
  • Space Debris, and the EU’s Space Act
  • AST SpaceMobile to launch 243 satellites
  • Rocket Lab partners with U.S.A.F. | AFRL for Neutron launch for rocket cargo missions

About Satnews

  • Contacts
  • History

Archives

  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020

Secondary Sidebar

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.OkPrivacy policy
x
Sign up Now (For Free)
Access daily or weekly satellite news updates covering all aspects of the commercial and military satellite industry.
Invalid email address
Notify Me Regarding ( At least one ):
We value your privacy and will not sell or share your email or other information with any other company. You may also unsubscribe at anytime.

Click Here to see our full privacy policy.
Thanks for subscribing!