• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar
  • NEWS:
  • SatNews
  • SatMagazine
  • MilSatMagazine
  • SmallSat News
  • |     EVENTS:
  • SmallSat Symposium
  • Satellite Innovation

SatNews

  • HOME
  • Magazines
  • Events
  • Perspectives
  • Industry Calendar
    • IN PERSON
    • VIRTUAL
  • Subscribe

Forrester Reports: Eutlesat Complains to the FCC Regarding Incentive Payments

June 3, 2020


Chris Forrester

An article posted by journalist Chris Forrester at the Advanced Television infosite reports that Eutelsat, not for the first time, has formally complained to the FCC over the Commission’s ruling that it would pay around $5 billion to both Intelsat and SES in ‘incentive payments’ for clearing certain C-band frequencies over the USA.

In essence, Eutelsat is fearful that the payments – and the related reimbursements of actual costs of new C-band satellites over the US – will mean that Intelsat and SES will use the cash to expand functionality and coverage beyond a one-for-one simple replacement scheme. Eutelsat says the FCC’s official estimates (aided by analysis by RKF Engineering Solutions) of the costs of these replacement satellites are far too high and thus are more sophisticated satellites than currently being used.

Both Intelsat and SES are looking to order between four and six satellites to replace the lost frequencies. SES, speaking to Advanced-Television on June 2nd, said that it was still in negotiation on the satellite contracts but it was likely that six satellites would ordered, although two would be ground spares.

Eutelsat’s comments added, “Such disproportionately large relocation reimbursement payments could only be for satellites with large (and heavy) buses, with large arrays of transponders operating on multiple frequency bands over large, non-CONUS regions,” Eutelsat stated. “Such payments, in effect, would improperly subsidize non-C-band satellite costs that are completely unrelated to the relocation process.”

Its formal letter to the FCC stated, “[Satellite] Reimbursement eligibility should be limited to in-orbit delivery of comparable facilities providing C-band capacity over [the Continental US].” and argued that,  “Because expectations regarding future relocation costs will directly impact the proceeds of the upcoming auction of this spectrum, the Commission should narrowly limit the range of eligible costs to those truly “necessary” to relocate incumbent services to comparable facilities.”

Filed Under: News

Primary Sidebar

Most Read Stories

  • AST Space Mobile To Become A Publicly Traded Company
  • UPDATE: Spaceflight's Orbital Transfer Vehicles Have Launches In Sight
  • United Launch Alliance Rocks NROL-44 Mission Launches to Support National Security
  • CNES Selects ANYWAVES For Reflectarray Antenna For Smallsats Demo
  • Top Global Teleport Operators Of 2020 Named By World Teleport Association (WTA)

About Satnews

  • Contacts
  • History

Archives

  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020

Secondary Sidebar

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.OkPrivacy policy
We Love Our Advertisers.
And you will too!

Please disable your adblock browser plugin to continue...

We promise to keep it unobtrusive.
We promise not to spam you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Invalid email address
Thanks for subscribing! Please check your email for further instructions.
x
Sign up Now (For Free)
Access daily or weekly satellite news updates covering all aspects of the commercial and military satellite industry.
Invalid email address
Notify Me Regarding ( At least one ):
We value your privacy and will not sell or share your email or other information with any other company. You may also unsubscribe at anytime.

Click Here to see our full privacy policy.
Thanks for subscribing!